I am a true enthusiast of your H4831 powder. I get fantastic velocity and precision out of any caliber I've tried it in. Through the twenty five-06 up for the 338 it is my go to powder of decision. I try all sorts of powders when Doing the job up loads, however the H4831 generally seems to appear out on top for precision and velocity when the case is of your 06 course or larger.
I have made use of H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There usually are not many cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem always to gravitate to other powders. Nevertheless, I am unable to declare that it would not do the job. It is simply that Several other powders function much better for a given cartridge. As an example, while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and very great groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. However, RL19 was marginally superior in precision, though the velocity was practically identical.
Can they be interchanged with no worries other then making use of ordinary load methods when switching from large amount to great deal?
We’d like to make certain that you’re 18 yrs of age or more mature just before allowing for you to shop our internet site. Are you 18 years of age or older?
The only distinction as I realize it is that the SC was created to do the job by way of powder actions improved (which it does). The for a longer time grains will not feed properly in the slightest degree in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Liberalism; The unachievable however approved notion that it is fully possible to pick up a turd with the thoroughly clean conclusion.
You could have to make several a lot more posts to get cleared to accomplish PM's. As soon as you get to that status I might post in the categorized reloading segment to see if anybody is in your area for the trade.
Although this is probably genuine, there's a h4831sc large amount far more to it than simply not blowing on your own up. He couldn't hit prairie pet dogs beyond about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion wasn't undertaking nearly anything favorable for his grouping capability with All those loads.
dioni.a.312 reported: In my expertise the one real big difference is that the shortcut meters improved via reloading gear. At the time It is loaded theres no useful change. I've heard that the shortcut may have a small bit more quickly burn off level but it seems insignificant. Click to grow...
Validate YOUR AGE Specified states prohibit marketing or marketing and advertising of firearms, ammunition, and associated firearm factors to minors. We’d like making sure that you’re 18 decades of age or older before allowing for you to shop our web page. Will you be 18 yrs of age or older?
As with the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the same/identical powder cept for grain size. Load data is interchangeable.
Back to old site Shut When there is everything with your cart, it will not be brought around into the outdated internet site.
I usually always have the sc Model. Using a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less on account of shorter kernels and I believe allows extra reliable metering so fewer time you're taking trickling in the last little bit of charge to h4831sc help make body weight. So fundamentally the SC will save you moments
I sawed just one in 50 % to see how thick the jackets had been, and so they have been quickly 2 times as thick for a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for the sixty four-grain Power Point, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I learn about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know something in any respect in regards to the 223. I h4831sc doubt that you're going to get anyplace with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.